This site is under construction - will be ready soon.
Your Guide to Our Vision

Public NPIRS

See the pressure points people are actually living with, state by state.

This public issue map puts the root issues in front of voters, organizers, and the press. It also lists district coverage and responsibility layers so accountability is visible instead of implied.

All 50 states

Every state from your root-issues map is published in one public NPIRS view.

District coverage

Each state includes its full U.S. House district list so public responsibility can be reviewed in plain view.

Responsibility layers

Statewide executive, legislative, and congressional responsibility is listed next to the issue pattern.

Sitka included

Alaska now includes a Sitka drill-down with the local issue table and accountability layers.

Public NPIRS Map

NPIRS Root Issues Map

Public NPIRS issue map for all 50 states, with federal and state legislative district coverage plus responsibility layers so the public can see who is accountable.

The national pattern is clear: housing, healthcare access, cost of living, infrastructure, climate and disaster resilience, addiction and mental health, and rural decline keep recurring. The winning message should localize those pressures instead of talking about them generically.

housinghealthcare accesscost of livinginfrastructureclimate and disaster resilienceaddiction and mental healthrural decline

States visible

50

Issue records

51

Districts listed

7226

Incentives to confront

Rules that pay for the harm

These issues come from people's stories. Each one names the incentive, the harm it causes, who is responsible, and how we fix it. Verified items are checked against law or federal data. Reported items are still being fact-checked.

Federal funding formulasFederalVerified in law or federal data

Federal money pays for adoption, not for bringing families home

What the rule rewards
Title IV-E Adoption Assistance is an open-ended federal entitlement, matched at 50 to 83 percent, that pays a monthly subsidy for each child adopted out of foster care, often until 18. The Adoption and Legal Guardianship Incentive program pays states bonuses on top of that for adoptions above a baseline: $5,000 per foster child adoption, versus $4,000 per guardianship. A child returned home to their parent earns the state no incentive payment.
The harm
When adoption is the outcome that pays and gets counted, agencies and courts drift toward adoption, even when a family wants guardianship or reunification is within reach.
How we fix it
Pay reunification and kinship guardianship at least as much as adoption. Fund family preservation and treatment services as open-ended entitlements like adoption assistance, and count safe reunification as a permanency success in federal reviews.
What we've checked
  • Adoption incentives were created by the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997, originally $4,000 per adoption above baseline plus $2,000 more for a child with special needs.
  • In 2014, Congress renamed the program and added guardianship. A foster child adoption earns $5,000 and a guardianship earns $4,000. Older children earn $7,500 or $10,000 for either outcome.
  • Reunification with a parent is not an eligible outcome under the incentive program.
Responsible
U.S. Congress (Social Security Act, Title IV-E) · HHS Administration for Children and Families

Raised in: Borrowed Time by Ciara Mason

Deadlines that override peopleFederalVerified in law or federal data

A 15-month federal clock is shorter than recovery

What the rule rewards
The Adoption and Safe Families Act requires states to file to terminate parental rights once a child has been in foster care for 15 of the last 22 months, unless an exception applies.
The harm
Recovery from addiction is measured in years. Parents who are clean and in treatment can still run out of time, and judges describe giving them more time as “borrowing time” from the child, even when the child is safe with relatives.
How we fix it
Make the exceptions the default when a child is safe with relatives or a parent is in active treatment. Lengthen the timeline for parents making documented progress, and require courts to state on the record why guardianship would not work before terminating rights.
What we've checked
  • The 15-of-22-month filing requirement is in 42 U.S.C. 675(5)(E).
  • The law already allows states not to file when the child is being cared for by a relative, when there is a compelling reason, or when the state has not provided the services the family needed. Families are rarely told these exceptions exist.
Responsible
U.S. Congress (Adoption and Safe Families Act) · State child welfare agencies · Dependency courts

Raised in: Borrowed Time by Ciara Mason

Federal funding formulasFederalVerified in law or federal data

Kinship guardianship support is optional for states

What the rule rewards
Adoption assistance is a federal entitlement in every state. The Title IV-E Guardianship Assistance Program, created in 2008, is a state option, and it comes with extra eligibility conditions.
The harm
Relatives can be told that the monthly support only comes with adoption. That pushes grandparents and aunts to legally erase a parent so they can afford to care for the child.
How we fix it
Make guardianship assistance mandatory in every state, at the same rate as adoption assistance. Require courts and caseworkers to explain both options, in writing, before a relative chooses.
What we've checked
  • The Guardianship Assistance Program was created by the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008, and states must opt in through a Title IV-E plan amendment.
  • Nevada runs a Kinship Guardianship Assistance Program (KinGAP) under NRS 432B.623. We are requesting the date it began and what families in Washoe County were told about it in 2015.
Responsible
U.S. Congress · Nevada Division of Child and Family Services

Raised in: Borrowed Time by Ciara Mason

Power without accountabilityNVReported in stories, under review

Families aren’t told that safety plans are voluntary

What the rule rewards
Voluntary safety plans let an agency control where a child lives without a court order, a lawyer, or a judge reviewing the decision.
The harm
Families believe the plans are mandatory and give up rights they still have. The agency gets the control without having to answer to a court.
How we fix it
Require a written, plain-language notice that a safety plan is voluntary, that the family can talk to a lawyer, and how to end the plan. Put time limits and court review on any plan lasting more than a few weeks.
Responsible
Washoe County Human Services Agency · Nevada Division of Child and Family Services · Nevada Legislature

Raised in: Borrowed Time by Ciara Mason

Power without accountabilityNVReported in stories, under review

Relatives turned away over old, minor records

What the rule rewards
Caseworkers have wide discretion to approve or reject relatives, with no requirement to explain the decision or to apply the same standard to every placement.
The harm
A grandmother was rejected over a closed report and a misdemeanor from about 19 years earlier. Weeks before, the agency had approved a placement it knew had no food in the home.
How we fix it
Adopt kin-specific approval standards that look only at current safety, require written reasons for any denial, and give relatives a fast appeal.
What we've checked
  • A 2023 federal rule (88 FR 66700) lets states use separate, lighter licensing standards for relatives. Nevada adopted kinship licensing standards in 2024 (DCFS Policy 1306), nine years after this story’s events.
Responsible
Washoe County Human Services Agency · Nevada Division of Child and Family Services

Raised in: Borrowed Time by Ciara Mason

Power without accountabilityNVReported in stories, under review

Emergency removals caused by the agency’s own delay

What the rule rewards
An “imminent danger” removal opens a court case and starts the federal clock, and nothing checks whether the agency created the emergency.
The harm
A family asked in writing for weeks how to keep a child with relatives during a planned trip. The agency didn’t answer, then pulled the three-year-old from daycare and placed her with strangers.
How we fix it
When an agency’s own delay or silence caused an emergency, require the court to dismiss the petition or place the child with family right away. Track and publish how often removals happen without a relative being considered first.
Responsible
Washoe County Human Services Agency · Second Judicial District Court, Family Division

Raised in: Borrowed Time by Ciara Mason

Federal funding formulasNVReported in stories, under review

Relatives steered toward adoption with the subsidy

What the rule rewards
States get federal reimbursement for adoption subsidies and earn incentive payments when adoptions go up, so adoption is the outcome the system is built to produce.
The harm
In this story, a grandmother told the court she wanted guardianship. The court raised the $600-a-month adoption payment three times, and the court authorized a search for adoptive strangers when she would not change her answer.
How we fix it
Require courts to present guardianship and adoption with equal financial support and in neutral terms. Bar the recruitment of non-relative adoptive homes while a willing relative is caring for the child and seeking guardianship.
What we've checked
  • We are requesting the hearing record and the subsidy rates Washoe County paid in 2015 to confirm the figure and the exchange.
Responsible
Second Judicial District Court, Family Division · Washoe County District Attorney (child welfare unit) · Washoe County Human Services Agency

Raised in: Borrowed Time by Ciara Mason

Power without accountabilityNVReported in stories, under review

Post-adoption contact promises with nothing to enforce them

What the rule rewards
Parents are told they can “help draft the post-adoption agreement” if they relinquish. After the adoption, only the adoptive parent can ask a court to change the agreement, and only to reduce contact.
The harm
Visitation awarded to a great-grandmother, grandmother, and aunt was never filed with the adoption decree. Every motion they filed to enforce it was denied for lack of standing, and contact was cut without a court order.
How we fix it
Require every post-adoption contact agreement to be incorporated into the decree before the adoption is final, give relatives named in it standing to enforce it, and make the court confirm this on the record.
What we've checked
  • Nevada law makes a post-adoptive contact agreement enforceable only if it is in writing, signed, and incorporated into the adoption decree (former NRS 127.187 and 127.188, since recodified in NRS chapter 127C).
  • Under former NRS 127.1895, only an adoptive parent can petition to modify or end the agreement, and a modification can only reduce contact.
Responsible
Nevada Legislature · Second Judicial District Court, Family Division

Raised in: Borrowed Time by Ciara Mason

Power without accountabilityNVReported in stories, under review

Case files that parents can’t correct

What the rule rewards
Caseworker reports go to the judge as evidence, and parents have no simple way to correct them before the hearing.
The harm
A caseworker told the caregiver not to share a doctor’s appointment, notified the mother 20 minutes before it began, then reported to the court that she misses her daughter’s appointments.
How we fix it
Give parents and their attorneys every court report at least five days before a hearing, with the right to file a written correction. Require notice of appointments and visits to be logged with a timestamp.
Responsible
Washoe County Human Services Agency · Nevada Division of Child and Family Services · Nevada Legislature

Raised in: Borrowed Time by Ciara Mason

Share your story to add an issue →

AL

Alabama root issues

Alabama voters are consistently feeling pressure around rural poverty, health access, education gaps, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

147

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Rural povertyHealth accessEducation gapsInfrastructureJobs beyond low-wage work

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Alabama full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

7 listed

State senate districts

Alabama full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

35 listed

State House districts

Alabama full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

105 listed

Responsibility layers

Alabama governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Alabama U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Alabama U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Alabama state senate

major

State Senate

Alabama lower legislative chamber

major

State House

AK

Alaska root issues

Alaska voters are consistently feeling pressure around cost of living, energy and fuel costs, rural isolation, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

61

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Cost of livingEnergy and fuel costsRural isolationNative community servicesClimate and coastal erosion

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Alaska full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

1 listed

State senate districts

Alaska full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

20 listed

State House districts

Alaska full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

40 listed

Responsibility layers

Alaska governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Alaska U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Alaska U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Alaska state senate

major

State Senate

Alaska lower legislative chamber

major

State House

Local drill-down

Sitka root issues

Sitka is dealing with island affordability pressure: housing, childcare, materials, freight, utilities, healthcare, and transportation all cost more because the community is remote, land-constrained, and dependent on outside supply chains.

Districts listed

3

IssueRoot problem
Housing shortageNot enough available or affordable homes; hits young workers, Native families, elders, renters, and people with pets hardest.
Access to general materialsIsland logistics make building supplies, repairs, groceries, and basic goods more expensive and slower to obtain.
Childcare shortageHousing and childcare are repeatedly named as the two biggest barriers to recruiting and keeping workers in Sitka.
High cost of livingResidents struggle to stay in the community through all life stages because wages do not always match local costs.
Workforce retentionJobs go unfilled because people cannot find housing, childcare, or affordable daily living.
Utility costsSitka strategic planning specifically flags the burden of utility costs as something needing relief.
Tourism pressureCruise traffic brings money, but also strains quality of life, local services, downtown congestion, and housing and workforce demand.
Healthcare and behavioral health accessLike much of rural and coastal Alaska, Sitka faces access challenges around mental health, substance-use care, specialty care, and elder services.
Transportation dependencyFerry and air access make travel, medical appointments, freight, school trips, and emergency movement expensive and weather-sensitive.
Infrastructure resilienceRoads, ports, utilities, public buildings, water and sewer, and emergency systems must handle island conditions, storms, aging assets, and high costs.
Local economy dependenceFishing, tourism, government, healthcare, and education are key pillars; shocks in any one sector hit the town hard.
Tribal and Native community needsHousing, health services, cultural preservation, elder support, and economic opportunity are especially important for Sitka Native residents.

Local district coverage

Sitka accountability spans the federal at-large district plus local borough, school, tribal, and state delivery systems.

Federal coverage

Sitka sits inside the Alaska at-large federal district.

1 listed

Local governance coverage

Local delivery also runs through borough and school governance.

2 listed

Responsible bodies

City and Borough of Sitka

primary

Local Government

Sitka Tribe of Alaska and tribal service partners

major

Tribal Government

Alaska statewide housing, transportation, health, and education agencies

major

State Agency

Alaska at-large congressional delegation

shared

Congressional Delegation

Campaign wording

Sitka root problem is not just housing. It is island affordability: homes, childcare, materials, freight, utilities, healthcare, and transportation all cost more because the community is remote, land-constrained, and dependent on outside supply chains.

AZ

Arizona root issues

Arizona voters are consistently feeling pressure around water scarcity, housing costs, border pressure, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

69

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Water scarcityHousing costsBorder pressureHeatFast-growth infrastructure

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Arizona full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

9 listed

State senate districts

Arizona uses the same 30 legislative districts for the senate and house, with two house members elected from each district.

30 listed

State House districts

Arizona uses the same 30 legislative districts for the senate and house, with two house members elected from each district.

30 listed

Responsibility layers

Arizona governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Arizona U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Arizona U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Arizona state senate

major

State Senate

Arizona lower legislative chamber

major

State House

AR

Arkansas root issues

Arkansas voters are consistently feeling pressure around low wages, rural hospitals, education outcomes, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

139

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Low wagesRural hospitalsEducation outcomesBroadbandAddiction and mental health

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Arkansas full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

4 listed

State senate districts

Arkansas full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

35 listed

State House districts

Arkansas full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

100 listed

Responsibility layers

Arkansas governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Arkansas U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Arkansas U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Arkansas state senate

major

State Senate

Arkansas lower legislative chamber

major

State House

CA

California root issues

California voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing affordability, homelessness, wildfire and insurance, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

172

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Housing affordabilityHomelessnessWildfire and insuranceCost of livingWater

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

California full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

52 listed

State senate districts

California full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

40 listed

State Assembly districts

California full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

80 listed

Responsibility layers

California governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

California U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

California U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

California state senate

major

State Senate

California lower legislative chamber

major

State House

CO

Colorado root issues

Colorado voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing, growth pressure, water, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

108

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

HousingGrowth pressureWaterWildfire riskRural-urban divide

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Colorado full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

8 listed

State senate districts

Colorado full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

35 listed

State House districts

Colorado full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

65 listed

Responsibility layers

Colorado governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Colorado U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Colorado U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Colorado state senate

major

State Senate

Colorado lower legislative chamber

major

State House

CT

Connecticut root issues

Connecticut voters are consistently feeling pressure around high taxes and costs, housing shortage, aging infrastructure, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

192

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

High taxes and costsHousing shortageAging infrastructureInequalityHealthcare costs

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Connecticut full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

5 listed

State senate districts

Connecticut full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

36 listed

State House districts

Connecticut full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

151 listed

Responsibility layers

Connecticut governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Connecticut U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Connecticut U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Connecticut state senate

major

State Senate

Connecticut lower legislative chamber

major

State House

DE

Delaware root issues

Delaware voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing, coastal flooding, chemical and environmental legacy, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

63

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

HousingCoastal floodingChemical and environmental legacyHealthcare accessWages

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Delaware full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

1 listed

State senate districts

Delaware full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

21 listed

State House districts

Delaware full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

41 listed

Responsibility layers

Delaware governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Delaware U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Delaware U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Delaware state senate

major

State Senate

Delaware lower legislative chamber

major

State House

FL

Florida root issues

Florida voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing and insurance crisis, hurricane resilience, healthcare coverage, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

188

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Housing and insurance crisisHurricane resilienceHealthcare coverageGrowthSenior affordability

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Florida full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

28 listed

State senate districts

Florida full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

40 listed

State House districts

Florida full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

120 listed

Responsibility layers

Florida governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Florida U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Florida U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Florida state senate

major

State Senate

Florida lower legislative chamber

major

State House

GA

Georgia root issues

Georgia voters are consistently feeling pressure around atlanta growth strain, rural healthcare, transportation, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

250

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Atlanta growth strainRural healthcareTransportationHousingVoting and civic trust

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Georgia full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

14 listed

State senate districts

Georgia full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

56 listed

State House districts

Georgia full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

180 listed

Responsibility layers

Georgia governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Georgia U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Georgia U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Georgia state senate

major

State Senate

Georgia lower legislative chamber

major

State House

HI

Hawaii root issues

Hawaii voters are consistently feeling pressure around extreme cost of living, housing shortage, native hawaiian displacement, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

78

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Extreme cost of livingHousing shortageNative Hawaiian displacementTourism dependenceDisaster resilience

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Hawaii full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

2 listed

State senate districts

Hawaii full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

25 listed

State House districts

Hawaii full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

51 listed

Responsibility layers

Hawaii governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Hawaii U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Hawaii U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Hawaii state senate

major

State Senate

Hawaii lower legislative chamber

major

State House

ID

Idaho root issues

Idaho voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing from rapid growth, water, rural healthcare, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

72

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Housing from rapid growthWaterRural healthcarePublic landsWages lagging costs

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Idaho full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

2 listed

State senate districts

Idaho uses 35 legislative districts; each district elects one senator and two representatives.

35 listed

Shared legislative House districts

Idaho uses 35 legislative districts; each district elects one senator and two representatives.

35 listed

Responsibility layers

Idaho governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Idaho U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Idaho U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Idaho state senate

major

State Senate

Idaho lower legislative chamber

major

State House

IL

Illinois root issues

Illinois voters are consistently feeling pressure around taxes and pensions, chicago public safety, population loss areas, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

194

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Taxes and pensionsChicago public safetyPopulation loss areasHousingIndustrial transition

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Illinois full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

17 listed

State senate districts

Illinois full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

59 listed

State House districts

Illinois full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

118 listed

Responsibility layers

Illinois governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Illinois U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Illinois U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Illinois state senate

major

State Senate

Illinois lower legislative chamber

major

State House

IN

Indiana root issues

Indiana voters are consistently feeling pressure around manufacturing transition, wages, addiction, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

159

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Manufacturing transitionWagesAddictionEducation and workforceRural healthcare

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Indiana full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

9 listed

State senate districts

Indiana full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

50 listed

State House districts

Indiana full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

100 listed

Responsibility layers

Indiana governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Indiana U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Indiana U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Indiana state senate

major

State Senate

Indiana lower legislative chamber

major

State House

IA

Iowa root issues

Iowa voters are consistently feeling pressure around farm economy, water quality, rural population decline, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

154

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Farm economyWater qualityRural population declineHealthcare accessEducation

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Iowa full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

4 listed

State senate districts

Iowa full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

50 listed

State House districts

Iowa full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

100 listed

Responsibility layers

Iowa governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Iowa U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Iowa U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Iowa state senate

major

State Senate

Iowa lower legislative chamber

major

State House

KS

Kansas root issues

Kansas voters are consistently feeling pressure around rural depopulation, agriculture stress, water depletion, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

169

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Rural depopulationAgriculture stressWater depletionWorkforceBroadband

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Kansas full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

4 listed

State senate districts

Kansas full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

40 listed

State House districts

Kansas full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

125 listed

Responsibility layers

Kansas governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Kansas U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Kansas U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Kansas state senate

major

State Senate

Kansas lower legislative chamber

major

State House

KY

Kentucky root issues

Kentucky voters are consistently feeling pressure around coal transition, addiction, rural health, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

144

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Coal transitionAddictionRural healthPovertyInfrastructure

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Kentucky full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

6 listed

State senate districts

Kentucky full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

38 listed

State House districts

Kentucky full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

100 listed

Responsibility layers

Kentucky governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Kentucky U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Kentucky U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Kentucky state senate

major

State Senate

Kentucky lower legislative chamber

major

State House

LA

Louisiana root issues

Louisiana voters are consistently feeling pressure around flooding and coastal loss, insurance, poverty, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

150

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Flooding and coastal lossInsurancePovertyEnergy transitionPublic health

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Louisiana full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

6 listed

State senate districts

Louisiana full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

39 listed

State House districts

Louisiana full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

105 listed

Responsibility layers

Louisiana governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Louisiana U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Louisiana U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Louisiana state senate

major

State Senate

Louisiana lower legislative chamber

major

State House

ME

Maine root issues

Maine voters are consistently feeling pressure around aging population, housing, rural healthcare, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

188

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Aging populationHousingRural healthcareHeating costsWorkforce shortage

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Maine full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

2 listed

State senate districts

Maine full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

35 listed

State House districts

Maine full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

151 listed

Responsibility layers

Maine governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Maine U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Maine U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Maine state senate

major

State Senate

Maine lower legislative chamber

major

State House

MD

Maryland root issues

Maryland voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing, transportation, crime concerns, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

102

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

HousingTransportationCrime concernsFederal workforce dependenceInequality

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Maryland full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

8 listed

State senate districts

Maryland full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

47 listed

Shared House and delegate districts

Maryland House delegation generally follows the same 47 legislative districts, with some delegate subdistrict splits inside them.

47 listed

Responsibility layers

Maryland governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Maryland U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Maryland U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Maryland state senate

major

State Senate

Maryland lower legislative chamber

major

State House

MA

Massachusetts root issues

Massachusetts voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing costs, transit reliability, migrant services, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

209

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Housing costsTransit reliabilityMigrant servicesHealthcare costsIncome inequality

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Massachusetts full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

9 listed

State senate districts

Massachusetts full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

40 listed

State House districts

Massachusetts full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

160 listed

Responsibility layers

Massachusetts governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Massachusetts U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Massachusetts U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Massachusetts state senate

major

State Senate

Massachusetts lower legislative chamber

major

State House

MI

Michigan root issues

Michigan voters are consistently feeling pressure around auto and ev transition, water infrastructure, detroit-region inequality, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

161

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Auto and EV transitionWater infrastructureDetroit-region inequalityEducationRoads

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Michigan full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

13 listed

State senate districts

Michigan full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

38 listed

State House districts

Michigan full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

110 listed

Responsibility layers

Michigan governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Michigan U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Michigan U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Michigan state senate

major

State Senate

Michigan lower legislative chamber

major

State House

MN

Minnesota root issues

Minnesota voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing, rural-urban divide, healthcare access, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

209

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

HousingRural-urban divideHealthcare accessAgriculturePublic safety concerns

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Minnesota full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

8 listed

State senate districts

Minnesota full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

67 listed

State House districts

Minnesota full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

134 listed

Responsibility layers

Minnesota governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Minnesota U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Minnesota U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Minnesota state senate

major

State Senate

Minnesota lower legislative chamber

major

State House

MS

Mississippi root issues

Mississippi voters are consistently feeling pressure around deep poverty, healthcare access, education, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

178

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Deep povertyHealthcare accessEducationWater and sewer infrastructureRural jobs

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Mississippi full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

4 listed

State senate districts

Mississippi full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

52 listed

State House districts

Mississippi full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

122 listed

Responsibility layers

Mississippi governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Mississippi U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Mississippi U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Mississippi state senate

major

State Senate

Mississippi lower legislative chamber

major

State House

MO

Missouri root issues

Missouri voters are consistently feeling pressure around crime and public safety, rural hospitals, wages, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

205

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Crime and public safetyRural hospitalsWagesEducationInfrastructure

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Missouri full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

8 listed

State senate districts

Missouri full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

34 listed

State House districts

Missouri full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

163 listed

Responsibility layers

Missouri governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Missouri U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Missouri U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Missouri state senate

major

State Senate

Missouri lower legislative chamber

major

State House

MT

Montana root issues

Montana voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing from in-migration, public lands, rural healthcare, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

152

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Housing from in-migrationPublic landsRural healthcareWildfireNative community needs

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Montana full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

2 listed

State senate districts

Montana full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

50 listed

State House districts

Montana full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

100 listed

Responsibility layers

Montana governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Montana U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Montana U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Montana state senate

major

State Senate

Montana lower legislative chamber

major

State House

NE

Nebraska root issues

Nebraska voters are consistently feeling pressure around farm economy, water, workforce shortage, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

52

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Farm economyWaterWorkforce shortageRural depopulationBroadband

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Nebraska full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

3 listed

Unicameral legislative districts

Nebraska uses a single nonpartisan legislative chamber.

49 listed

Responsibility layers

Nebraska governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Nebraska U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Nebraska U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Nebraska unicameral legislature

major

State Legislature

NV

Nevada root issues

Nevada voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing, water, tourism dependence, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

67

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

HousingWaterTourism dependenceHeatHealthcare access

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Nevada full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

4 listed

State senate districts

Nevada full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

21 listed

State Assembly districts

Nevada full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

42 listed

Responsibility layers

Nevada governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Nevada U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Nevada U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Nevada state senate

major

State Senate

Nevada lower legislative chamber

major

State House

NH

New Hampshire root issues

New Hampshire voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing shortage, opioid crisis, aging population, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

230

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Housing shortageOpioid crisisAging populationProperty taxesWorkforce

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

New Hampshire full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

2 listed

State senate districts

New Hampshire full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

24 listed

House and floterial accountability districts

New Hampshire House representation uses a mix of local, multi-member, and floterial districts; labels here are synthetic accountability groupings covering the full chamber map.

204 listed

Responsibility layers

New Hampshire governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

New Hampshire U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

New Hampshire U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

New Hampshire state senate

major

State Senate

New Hampshire lower legislative chamber

major

State House

NJ

New Jersey root issues

New Jersey voters are consistently feeling pressure around affordability and taxes, housing, transit, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

92

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Affordability and taxesHousingTransitFloodingHealthcare costs

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

New Jersey full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

12 listed

State senate districts

New Jersey uses the same 40 legislative districts for the senate and general assembly.

40 listed

Shared General Assembly districts

New Jersey uses the same 40 legislative districts for the senate and general assembly.

40 listed

Responsibility layers

New Jersey governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

New Jersey U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

New Jersey U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

New Jersey state senate

major

State Senate

New Jersey lower legislative chamber

major

State House

NM

New Mexico root issues

New Mexico voters are consistently feeling pressure around poverty, education, native and rural services, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

115

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

PovertyEducationNative and rural servicesWaterCrime

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

New Mexico full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

3 listed

State senate districts

New Mexico full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

42 listed

State House districts

New Mexico full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

70 listed

Responsibility layers

New Mexico governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

New Mexico U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

New Mexico U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

New Mexico state senate

major

State Senate

New Mexico lower legislative chamber

major

State House

NY

New York root issues

New York voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing, taxes and cost of living, migrant services, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

239

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

HousingTaxes and cost of livingMigrant servicesTransitUpstate economic decline

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

New York full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

26 listed

State senate districts

New York full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

63 listed

State Assembly districts

New York full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

150 listed

Responsibility layers

New York governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

New York U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

New York U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

New York state senate

major

State Senate

New York lower legislative chamber

major

State House

NC

North Carolina root issues

North Carolina voters are consistently feeling pressure around growth pressure, housing, rural healthcare, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

184

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Growth pressureHousingRural healthcareStorm resilienceEducation and workforce

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

North Carolina full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

14 listed

State senate districts

North Carolina full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

50 listed

State House districts

North Carolina full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

120 listed

Responsibility layers

North Carolina governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

North Carolina U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

North Carolina U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

North Carolina state senate

major

State Senate

North Carolina lower legislative chamber

major

State House

ND

North Dakota root issues

North Dakota voters are consistently feeling pressure around energy and agriculture volatility, rural services, workforce, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

95

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Energy and agriculture volatilityRural servicesWorkforceInfrastructureNative community needs

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

North Dakota full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

1 listed

State senate districts

North Dakota uses 47 legislative districts; each district elects one senator and two representatives.

47 listed

Shared legislative House districts

North Dakota uses 47 legislative districts; each district elects one senator and two representatives.

47 listed

Responsibility layers

North Dakota governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

North Dakota U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

North Dakota U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

North Dakota state senate

major

State Senate

North Dakota lower legislative chamber

major

State House

OH

Ohio root issues

Ohio voters are consistently feeling pressure around manufacturing transition, addiction, wages, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

147

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Manufacturing transitionAddictionWagesPublic healthAging infrastructure

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Ohio full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

15 listed

State senate districts

Ohio full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

33 listed

State House districts

Ohio full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

99 listed

Responsibility layers

Ohio governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Ohio U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Ohio U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Ohio state senate

major

State Senate

Ohio lower legislative chamber

major

State House

OK

Oklahoma root issues

Oklahoma voters are consistently feeling pressure around tribal-state relations, rural healthcare, education funding, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

154

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Tribal-state relationsRural healthcareEducation fundingEnergy volatilityStorm resilience

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Oklahoma full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

5 listed

State senate districts

Oklahoma full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

48 listed

State House districts

Oklahoma full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

101 listed

Responsibility layers

Oklahoma governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Oklahoma U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Oklahoma U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Oklahoma state senate

major

State Senate

Oklahoma lower legislative chamber

major

State House

OR

Oregon root issues

Oregon voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing and homelessness, wildfire, addiction and mental health, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

96

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Housing and homelessnessWildfireAddiction and mental healthRural-urban divideCost of living

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Oregon full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

6 listed

State senate districts

Oregon full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

30 listed

State House districts

Oregon full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

60 listed

Responsibility layers

Oregon governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Oregon U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Oregon U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Oregon state senate

major

State Senate

Oregon lower legislative chamber

major

State House

PA

Pennsylvania root issues

Pennsylvania voters are consistently feeling pressure around aging infrastructure, energy and jobs balance, opioid crisis, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

270

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Aging infrastructureEnergy and jobs balanceOpioid crisisHousingPost-industrial towns

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Pennsylvania full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

17 listed

State senate districts

Pennsylvania full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

50 listed

State House districts

Pennsylvania full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

203 listed

Responsibility layers

Pennsylvania governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Pennsylvania U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Pennsylvania U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Pennsylvania state senate

major

State Senate

Pennsylvania lower legislative chamber

major

State House

RI

Rhode Island root issues

Rhode Island voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing, coastal flooding, healthcare access, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

115

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

HousingCoastal floodingHealthcare accessTaxes and costsAging population

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Rhode Island full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

2 listed

State senate districts

Rhode Island full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

38 listed

State House districts

Rhode Island full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

75 listed

Responsibility layers

Rhode Island governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Rhode Island U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Rhode Island U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Rhode Island state senate

major

State Senate

Rhode Island lower legislative chamber

major

State House

SC

South Carolina root issues

South Carolina voters are consistently feeling pressure around rapid growth, infrastructure, coastal storms, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

177

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Rapid growthInfrastructureCoastal stormsEducation gapsHealthcare access

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

South Carolina full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

7 listed

State senate districts

South Carolina full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

46 listed

State House districts

South Carolina full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

124 listed

Responsibility layers

South Carolina governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

South Carolina U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

South Carolina U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

South Carolina state senate

major

State Senate

South Carolina lower legislative chamber

major

State House

SD

South Dakota root issues

South Dakota voters are consistently feeling pressure around rural healthcare, native community poverty, housing, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

71

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Rural healthcareNative community povertyHousingAgricultureWorkforce

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

South Dakota full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

1 listed

State senate districts

South Dakota uses 35 legislative districts; each district elects one senator and two representatives.

35 listed

Shared legislative House districts

South Dakota uses 35 legislative districts; each district elects one senator and two representatives.

35 listed

Responsibility layers

South Dakota governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

South Dakota U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

South Dakota U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

South Dakota state senate

major

State Senate

South Dakota lower legislative chamber

major

State House

TN

Tennessee root issues

Tennessee voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing from growth, healthcare access, infrastructure, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

141

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Housing from growthHealthcare accessInfrastructureWagesEducation

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Tennessee full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

9 listed

State senate districts

Tennessee full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

33 listed

State House districts

Tennessee full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

99 listed

Responsibility layers

Tennessee governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Tennessee U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Tennessee U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Tennessee state senate

major

State Senate

Tennessee lower legislative chamber

major

State House

TX

Texas root issues

Texas voters are consistently feeling pressure around healthcare coverage, border and security strain, housing and property taxes, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

219

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Healthcare coverageBorder and security strainHousing and property taxesGrid reliabilityWater

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Texas full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

38 listed

State senate districts

Texas full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

31 listed

State House districts

Texas full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

150 listed

Responsibility layers

Texas governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Texas U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Texas U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Texas state senate

major

State Senate

Texas lower legislative chamber

major

State House

UT

Utah root issues

Utah voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing affordability, water, growth, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

108

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Housing affordabilityWaterGrowthPublic landsAir quality

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Utah full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

4 listed

State senate districts

Utah full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

29 listed

State House districts

Utah full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

75 listed

Responsibility layers

Utah governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Utah U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Utah U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Utah state senate

major

State Senate

Utah lower legislative chamber

major

State House

VT

Vermont root issues

Vermont voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing, aging population, flood resilience, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

126

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

HousingAging populationFlood resilienceRural healthcareTaxes

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Vermont full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

1 listed

State senate districts

Vermont senate districts are county-based and multi-member; labels here are synthetic accountability groupings for the chamber map.

16 listed

House accountability districts

Vermont House representation uses a mix of single-member and multi-member districts; labels here are synthetic accountability groupings covering the full chamber map.

109 listed

Responsibility layers

Vermont governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Vermont U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Vermont U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Vermont state senate

major

State Senate

Vermont lower legislative chamber

major

State House

VA

Virginia root issues

Virginia voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing, transportation, federal workforce reliance, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

151

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

HousingTransportationFederal workforce relianceRural broadbandEducation

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Virginia full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

11 listed

State senate districts

Virginia full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

40 listed

House of Delegates districts

Virginia full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

100 listed

Responsibility layers

Virginia governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Virginia U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Virginia U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Virginia state senate

major

State Senate

Virginia lower legislative chamber

major

State House

WA

Washington root issues

Washington voters are consistently feeling pressure around housing and homelessness, fentanyl and mental health, wildfire, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

108

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Housing and homelessnessFentanyl and mental healthWildfireCost of livingFerry and transport issues

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Washington full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

10 listed

State senate districts

Washington uses the same 49 legislative districts for the senate and house, with two house members elected from each district.

49 listed

Shared legislative House districts

Washington uses the same 49 legislative districts for the senate and house, with two house members elected from each district.

49 listed

Responsibility layers

Washington governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Washington U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Washington U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Washington state senate

major

State Senate

Washington lower legislative chamber

major

State House

WV

West Virginia root issues

West Virginia voters are consistently feeling pressure around coal transition, addiction, rural health, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

119

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Coal transitionAddictionRural healthPovertyBroadband

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

West Virginia full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

2 listed

State senate districts

West Virginia full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

17 listed

State House districts

West Virginia full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

100 listed

Responsibility layers

West Virginia governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

West Virginia U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

West Virginia U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

West Virginia state senate

major

State Senate

West Virginia lower legislative chamber

major

State House

WI

Wisconsin root issues

Wisconsin voters are consistently feeling pressure around dairy and farm stress, manufacturing workforce, housing, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

140

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Dairy and farm stressManufacturing workforceHousingWater qualityRural healthcare

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Wisconsin full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

8 listed

State senate districts

Wisconsin full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

33 listed

State Assembly districts

Wisconsin full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

99 listed

Responsibility layers

Wisconsin governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Wisconsin U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Wisconsin U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Wisconsin state senate

major

State Senate

Wisconsin lower legislative chamber

major

State House

WY

Wyoming root issues

Wyoming voters are consistently feeling pressure around energy transition, public lands, rural healthcare, and the broader squeeze on basic stability.

District coverage

94

Federal and state legislative groups listed

Root issues

Energy transitionPublic landsRural healthcareHousing in boom townsWater

The winning campaign message should localize the root issues people are actually living with instead of speaking about them in generic national abstractions.

District coverage below includes federal and state legislative accountability layers. Labels are public routing labels for full coverage; some states use shared districts, subdistricts, or multi-member chambers.

U.S. House districts

Wyoming full U.S. House coverage for federal accountability routing.

1 listed

State senate districts

Wyoming full state senate coverage for legislative accountability routing.

31 listed

State House districts

Wyoming full lower-chamber coverage for legislative accountability routing.

62 listed

Responsibility layers

Wyoming governor and executive agencies

primary

Executive

Wyoming U.S. House delegation

major

Congressional Delegation

Wyoming U.S. Senate delegation

major

Senate Delegation

Wyoming state senate

major

State Senate

Wyoming lower legislative chamber

major

State House

Report an IssueOfficial ScorecardsAccountability Dashboard