This site is under construction - will be ready soon.
Your Guide to Our Vision
← Back to Blog

The Same-Species TestSchumer, Jeffries, and Every Leader in Washington

We Are One Species. Our Leaders Should Act Like It.

Cordova 2028 ·

By Vince Cordova (Vinnie) · Cordova 2028: Moving Forward Together

Campaign poster titled “The Same-Species Test: Schumer, Jeffries, and Every Leader in Washington.” Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries flank the U.S. Capitol under a stormy sky. On the left, protesters hold a “People Not Profits” sign; on the right, a child sits in the rubble of a bombed building. A red banner reads “We Are One Species. Our Leaders Should Act Like It.” Below it, “The Test” lists three numbered questions, and a final line asks, “Do you understand that the people under the bombs are the same species as you?” A line of people holding hands is silhouetted against a sunrise over the Earth.
Campaign design team

On November 18, House Democrats vote on whether Hakeem Jeffries leads them into the 120th Congress. In January, the full House decides whether he becomes Speaker. Senate Democrats will decide whether Chuck Schumer keeps the job he has held for a decade.

Nov 18

House Democrats vote on Jeffries

January

The full House votes for Speaker

Senate

Democrats decide on Schumer

Millions of Americans are already asking whether these two men should lead. They’re asking on TikTok, at town halls, and in petitions that have passed 100,000 signatures. I want to ask it properly. Not with memes. With the record.

This is not about party. I am an independent. I don’t get a vote in either caucus. What I have is a standard, and I intend to hold every leader in Washington to it. I’m starting with the two men who are being chosen right now.

The Test

Three questions. Anyone who asks to lead this country should be able to answer them out loud.

  1. 1

    Did the people get better or worse under your leadership?

  2. 2

    Did you stop the killing of civilians with American weapons, or did you help it continue?

  3. 3

    Who funds you, and did their money shape your vote?

Do you understand that the people under the bombs are the same species as you?

Under all three sits one deeper question. Do you understand that the people under the bombs are the same species as you? Same matter. Same value. Whether by creator or by evolution, there is no superior race, color, or people. Every species before us survived by working together. A leader who forgets that cannot be trusted with the power to decide who lives.

1Question One

Better or Worse

Chuck Schumer has served in Congress since 1981 and has led Senate Democrats for a decade. Hakeem Jeffries has served since 2013 and has led House Democrats since 2023. That is nearly sixty years in Washington between them.

Years in Washington

Schumer · since 198145
Jeffries · since 201313

≈ 58 years between them

To be fair, for the last two years they sat in the minority. Republicans held the White House, the House, and the Senate. They did not write every law. But leadership is not only what you pass. It is what you fight for, and what you refuse to give away.

In March 2025, Schumer backed a Republican stopgap funding bill that most House Democrats opposed. In November 2025, his caucus broke again to end the shutdown on Republican terms. His own party’s young voters, House members, and Senate candidates called for him to step aside.

Your rent

Better or worse?

Your healthcare

Better or worse?

Your groceries

Better or worse?

Your sense of safety

Better or worse?

So ask yourself. Across those decades, did your rent, your healthcare, your groceries, and your sense of safety get better? Most Americans already know their answer.

2Question Two

Chuck Schumer and the Weapons

Here the record speaks plainly. Schumer voted to keep the weapons flowing every single time.

Since November 2024, Senator Bernie Sanders has forced votes to block specific weapons sales to Israel. The first time, 19 senators said yes. In April 2025, 15. In July 2025, 27, more than half the Democratic caucus. In April 2026, 40 senators voted to block $295 million in Caterpillar bulldozers and 36 voted to block $151.8 million in 1,000-pound bombs.

Senators voting to block the weapons · Schumer’s vote

Nov 2024

Arms sales

19
No

Apr 2025

Arms sales

15
No

Jul 2025

Bombs & rifles

27
No

Apr 2026

$295M bulldozers

40
No

Apr 2026

$151.8M bombs

36
No

The conscience of the Senate moved.
Chuck Schumer did not.

Bulldozers and 1,000-pound bombs, approved while Gaza’s Ministry of Health counted more than 72,000 dead. Today it counts more than 74,600.

Schumer says security assistance is about the Israeli people, not any one government. Then answer the same question for the Palestinian people.

Are they not people too?

2Question Two

Hakeem Jeffries and the Weapons

In July 2026, the House voted on cutting $3.3 billion in U.S. military aid to Israel. 103 Democrats voted yes, including Katherine Clark, the second-ranking Democrat in the House. Hakeem Jeffries voted no, alongside 97 other Democrats and nearly every Republican.

House Democrats · Cut $3.3 billion in military aid · July 2026

103 Yes
98 No

Yes includes Katherine Clark, No. 2 House Democrat

No includes Hakeem Jeffries

He didn’t just vote. Before the vote he sent a “Dear Colleague” letter urging Democrats to oppose the cut.

This is a pattern, not a single vote. Jeffries supported the April 2024 Israel aid package. In a May 2024 60 Minutes interview, asked whether Israel’s bombing of Gaza had been indiscriminate, he said no.

  1. Apr 2024

    Supported the Israel aid package

  2. May 2024

    Told 60 Minutes the bombing of Gaza was not indiscriminate

  3. Jul 2026

    Sent a “Dear Colleague” letter, then voted no on the $3.3 billion cut

He says American policy in the Middle East must change for the good of Israel and the Palestinian people. He calls for surging humanitarian aid and rebuilding Gaza. But words are cheap when the vote goes the other way.

You cannot rebuild what you keep paying to destroy.

3Question Three

Who Funds You

Track AIPAC · Jeffries

More than $1.5 million

from AIPAC and other pro-Israel groups over his career

Nearly $300,000

from pro-Israel PACs in the 2026 cycle alone

Five

AIPAC-sponsored trips to Israel

Did their money shape your vote?

This year, hundreds of AIPAC-backed candidates won their primaries.

I won’t tell you money explains every vote. I will tell you this. When a leader’s major backers are built to protect one military relationship, and that leader votes their way while his own caucus votes the other way, the people deserve an explanation. The same goes for Senator Schumer, and for every member of Congress who takes this money.

That’s why my campaign wrote the American Electoral Sovereignty Act. No voter should ever have to wonder whose interests their representative is weighing.

The defense

Their Answer, and Why It Fails

Both men have a defense, and I’ll state it fairly.

Here is my answer

A vote that “wouldn’t pass anyway” is the freest vote a leader ever casts. It costs nothing but courage, and they still wouldn’t cast it.

Criticizing Netanyahu while shipping his government bulldozers is not a check on power. It’s a press release. And a midterm win built on voters who are furious about these weapons is not a mandate to keep sending them.

One standard

This Test Applies to Everyone

On the Sanders resolutions, every Republican senator voted to keep the weapons flowing. In the House, most Republicans voted to preserve the $3.3 billion. Republican leaders in both chambers fail this test too, and I’ll say so every time.

I’m naming Schumer and Jeffries first for two reasons. Their caucuses are choosing them right now. And they claim to speak for voters who have turned hard against these weapons. A majority of Democratic voters told AP-NORC they believe Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, as reported here.

Their own people moved. They didn’t.

I’ll also say what I won’t do. I won’t call anyone a traitor or an enemy of the state. That label has been used against nearly every dissenter in American history, and I won’t hand that weapon to anyone, in any party.

What I will say is simpler, and harder to dodge. A leader who votes again and again for the weapons killing human beings, while his own party moves the other way, has failed the test.

The ask

What We Are Asking

To every member of the incoming 120th Congress: before you vote for leadership on November 18 and in January, ask your candidate these three questions. Make them answer on the record, before you cast your vote.

To Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries: answer them yourselves, in public. We will publish your answers on cordova2028.com in full, unedited.

To every American who has been asking this question online: keep asking, but bring the record. Cite the vote, the date, the dollar amount. Call your representative and your senators and ask them the same three questions. A meme can be ignored. A roll call can’t.

Ask them

  1. 1Did the people get better or worse under your leadership?
  2. 2Did you stop the killing of civilians with American weapons, or did you help it continue?
  3. 3Who funds you, and did their money shape your vote?

My administration will hold everyone to one standard, through law and not through slogans. That’s the purpose of Executive Order 2029-01: no safe harbor for war crimes, anywhere, for anyone.

We are one species.

The people under the bombs are not strangers to us. They are us.

I am a piece of the collective essence of this world that never gives up and needs every other piece to be whole.

— Vinnie Cordova

Cordova 2028: Moving Forward Together

Community Comments

Community Comments

Share a public response to this post. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.

0 approved comments

Loading comments...

Comments are moderated for spam, abuse, and off-topic submissions.

Your age, area, and IP address are collected for moderation and internal reporting only.