Eliminating federal income taxes for individuals making < $30,000

Inspired by

Inspired by Cheyenne Rae | Autistic Swiftie - We hear you and thank you for sharing https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8dktxJo/

We hear you and we know that it is hard!

these plans can be used by any government official/president. Sometimes listening to the people will make the biggest changes.

Microsoft Notes

Eliminating federal income taxes for individuals making under $30,000 would have both positive and negative impacts. The primary impact would be on government revenue and the budget. Here's a broad overview of how this could play out:

1. Reduction in Government Revenue

- Current Contributions : Individuals making under $30,000 contribute a relatively small portion of overall tax revenue, compared to higher income brackets. The IRS data shows that the majority of federal income tax is paid by higher-income earners. However, the cumulative effect of exempting all individuals in this range could lead to a noticeable revenue shortfall.

- Revenue Loss Estimate : According to the IRS's income tax data, individuals making between $15,000 and $30,000 paid roughly $45 billion in taxes in 2020, while those earning less than $15,000 contributed much less. The total revenue loss would depend on how broadly the policy is applied, but it could be in the range of $50-60 billion annually. While significant, this is a fraction of the federal budget, which exceeds $4 trillion per year.

2. Economic Stimulus Effect

- Increased Disposable Income : By not taxing individuals making under $30,000, those households would have more disposable income, which could stimulate consumption, increase demand for goods and services, and potentially create more jobs.

- Potential for Growth : The added spending could have a multiplier effect in the economy, boosting growth and partially offsetting the revenue loss. This could result in more economic activity and higher tax revenue from other sources (such as corporate taxes, sales taxes, and taxes from higher income individuals).

3. Social and Economic Benefits

- Support for Lower-Income Households : This policy could alleviate financial pressure on low-income households, reduce poverty levels, and improve overall quality of life. It would also make the tax system more progressive by placing a greater share of the burden on wealthier individuals.

- Reduction in Welfare Dependency : Increasing disposable income for low-income earners might reduce reliance on government welfare programs, saving costs in social assistance areas.

4. Impact on Government Services

- Potential Budget Cuts : The loss of tax revenue might necessitate cuts to government programs or an increase in borrowing. The federal budget supports a wide range of services like healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Reduced revenue might mean fewer funds for these programs unless offset by alternative tax increases or spending reductions elsewhere.

In conclusion, while the direct impact on federal revenue would be notable but not catastrophic, the indirect effects could help offset some of that loss. However, the specific consequences would depend on how the policy is implemented and how other aspects of the budget and tax code are adjusted to balance the change.

to read the a presidential plan and goals - See Microsoft Notes @ Eliminating Federal Income Tax for individuals making under 30,000