They Would Rather Your Child Die Than Have a Government That Works for You

A Final Reflection on Power, Extraction, and the Choice Before Us

By Vincent Cordova · 3/16/2026

Let me tell you a story. A mother sits in a hospital waiting room. Her child has cancer. The doctors know how to treat it. The medicine exists. The equipment is right there. But the insurance company said no. Not because the treatment won't work. Not because there's a better option. Because somewhere in a spreadsheet, someone calculated that denying this claim would add 0.03% to this quarter's profits. The mother doesn't know about the spreadsheet. She knows her child is dying. She starts a GoFundMe. She begs strangers. She works three jobs. She sells everything. And maybe—maybe—if enough people care, if the algorithm favors her, if the internet notices—her child lives. This is not a bug in the system. This is the system working exactly as designed. The Proposal That Started This Conversation I drafted an Executive Order to create a Digital Life Preservation Fund. A backup system. A fallback when insurance says no, when the system fails, when bureaucracy decides your life isn't profitable enough to save. Digital Life Credits. Created by sovereign authority. Used only for humanitarian purposes. Transparent. Trackable. Immune from speculation. A way to say: No matter what, you will not die because you couldn't pay. I know it will face challenges. Constitutional challenges—does the President have this power? Economic challenges—would this create inflation? Privacy challenges—who gets to see your medical data? Implementation challenges—how do we prevent fraud? I named them honestly. The conservative legal foundations that would sue. The Federal Reserve that would push back. The privacy advocates with legitimate concerns. The economists who would call this irresponsible. But here's what I didn't name clearly enough: The people who would fight this most aren't worried about the Constitution or inflation or privacy. They're worried about losing control. Who Actually Fights Against Your Child Living? Let's name them. Not as villains in a movie. As people with names, with boards, with share prices, with bonuses tied to how many claims they deny. Insurance companies. Their entire business model depends on collecting premiums and then finding reasons not to pay. Every claim denied is profit kept. Every life saved is an expense incurred. They have calculated exactly how much a human life is worth, and it's always less than the cost of saving it. Private equity firms. They buy up hospitals, nursing homes, insurance companies, pharmaceutical manufacturers. They load them with debt. They cut staff. They raise prices. They extract everything they can and move on. When patients die from understaffed wards, that's not their problem. When families go bankrupt from medical debt, that's not in their quarterly reports. Pharmaceutical executives. They charge $10,000 for drugs that cost $100 to make. They let people die in other countries rather than lower prices here. They call it "recouping research costs" while spending more on marketing than on development. The asset managers. BlackRock. Vanguard. State Street. They own the shares. They vote the proxies. They hire the boards. They sit at the center of the web, collecting fees from every transaction, every denial, every death that generates return. And the politicians who take their money. Who write the laws that protect them. Who appoint the regulators that used to regulate. Who smile at cameras and say "thoughts and prayers" while collecting checks from the people causing the suffering. Who Hires the People Who Run This Machine? I said earlier that there's no single person pulling strings. But let's be honest about how this actually works. There are absolutely people pulling strings. Not one person in a smoke-filled room. But a network. A class. People who sit on multiple boards, move through the same circles, attend the same events, and share the same worldview. Who hires the board members of every major corporation? The largest shareholders. And the largest shareholders of virtually every public company are the same three asset managers: BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. Between them, they control 20-25% of the votes at most S&P 500 companies. They don't own the shares in the traditional sense—they manage them for pension funds and retirement accounts. But they vote those shares. And votes determine who sits on boards. Vanguard, BlackRock, & State Street has more influence over who runs American corporations than almost any elected official. Then those board members hire executives. Those executives influence government. Those government officials write rules that protect the system. And the system continues. This is not a conspiracy. It's a structure. A structure designed to concentrate power and extract value from everyone else. The Question You Have to Ask Yourself If your child was dying, and the treatment existed, and the only barrier was money— How far would you go? Would you sell your house? Would you drain your retirement? Would you beg strangers? Would you break the law? Would you burn the system down if that's what it took? Of course you would. Every parent would. So why don't we do that for each other? Why is it noble to bankrupt yourself saving your own child, but "socialism" to create a system where no child has to be saved that way? Why is it responsible to let insurance companies deny claims, but dangerous to build a backup fund that catches the people they reject? Why is it patriotic to die because you can't afford insulin, but un-American to demand that insulin be affordable? The Socialism Smokescreen They're going to call this socialism. They always do. Let me respond directly: If providing healthcare is socialism, then what do we call letting children die so insurance executives can buy second homes? If guaranteeing that no one dies from treatable conditions is socialism, then what do we call a system that profits from suffering? If using government authority to protect life is socialism, then what do we call firefighters? Police? The military? The CDC? Medicare? Social Security? Public schools? Roads? Bridges? They've convinced you that caring for each other is radical. That protecting each other is extreme. That keeping each other alive is somehow un-American. Meanwhile, the people telling you this are sitting on boards of companies that deny your care, raise your rent, poison your food, and extract everything you have. They're not worried about socialism. They're worried about losing their ability to profit from your suffering. The Deeper Truth About Control You know how this happened? It happened because we let them buy everything. We let private equity buy our hospitals. We let them buy our nursing homes. We let them buy our insurance companies. We let them buy our housing. We let them buy our food systems. We let them buy our prisons. We let them buy our politicians. And now we've reached the point where young entrepreneurs don't even build businesses to serve their communities anymore. They build businesses to sell to private equity. They ask: "What does the machine want?" instead of "What do my neighbors need?" This is how slavery evolved. Not with whips. With portfolios. You're not property on paper. But you're managed. You're extracted from. You're disposable if you stop producing. And the people managing you never face an election, never answer to a community, never have to look you in the eye while they decide your fate. The Empire Is Falling, and They'll Blame the Government Look at what's happening right now. The chaos. The dysfunction. The cruelty. The inability to help even when they claim they want to. That's not government failure. That's a system being hollowed out from within and blamed for its own hollowing. They've spent decades: • Defunding the agencies that could regulate them • Appointing industry insiders to watch over industry • Convincing you that government is the problem • Starving the beast, then pointing at its emaciated body and saying "See? It was never any good" When the empire falls—and all empires fall—they will point at the government. "The government failed. The bureaucracy was too slow. The politicians were too corrupt. We should have let the market handle it." They'll say this while the market (their market) is standing in the rubble holding the matches. The government will be blamed for not stopping something it was never allowed to stop. Because every time the government tried to regulate, they called it socialism. Every time it tried to protect, they called it overreach. Every time it tried to serve, they called it waste. Here's What They Won't Tell You They would rather your child die than have a government that works for you. Think about that. Let it settle. Every denied claim. Every closed hospital. Every unaffordable drug. Every family destroyed by medical debt. Every obituary that should have been written decades later. These are not accidents. These are not inefficiencies. These are features. Because a government that worked for you would: • Negotiate drug prices down to what the rest of the world pays • Cap insurance profits at reasonable levels • Guarantee coverage for everyone, no exceptions • Prosecute executives whose companies deny life-saving care • Regulate private equity out of healthcare, housing, education and food • Ensure that no one dies because they can't pay And that government would threaten their control. So they've done everything they can to make sure that government never exists. They've convinced you it can't work. They've convinced you it would cost too much. They've convinced you that caring for each other is somehow cheating. They've convinced you that your neighbor getting healthcare means you losing something. And while you're fighting each other over scraps, they're taking the whole feast. What Real Freedom Would Look Like Not the freedom to choose between insurance companies that all deny claims. Not the freedom to work three jobs and still go bankrupt from one emergency. Not the freedom to watch your child die while strangers on the internet decide whether you're worthy of help. Real freedom is: • Healthcare that can't be taken away • Housing that isn't someone else's investment • Food that nourishes instead of poisons • Work that pays enough to actually live • Time to be with your family, to rest, to create • A society where no one profits from your suffering • A government that exists to protect you, not manage you for someone else's gain That's not socialism. That's not communism. That's not radical theory. That's just treating people like people. What We Build Next Here's the truth: The machine is dying. Not because we're winning. Because it's consuming itself. You can't extract forever from a finite source. And the source—human hope, human trust, human willingness to participate—is running out. The question is: What replaces it? More of the same, just with different faces? Or something we actually build together? Start with your neighbors. The people closest to you. The ones who would notice if you were gone. What do they need? What can you build together? Maybe it's a mutual aid network. People pooling resources to cover medical bills, rent, food. Maybe it's a community clinic. Staffed by people who care, owned by the people it serves. Maybe it's a housing co-op. Where residents own the building and set the rules. Maybe it's a food co-op. Where farmers sell directly to eaters, cutting out the monopolies. Maybe it's a school. Where kids learn to think, not just obey. Maybe it's just a conversation. A real one, where people stop pretending and start telling the truth about their lives. None of this requires permission. None of this requires legislation. None of this requires them to approve. It just requires people showing up for each other. The Final Question We've talked about a lot in this conversation. The Executive Order. The Digital Life Preservation Fund. The insurance denials. The private equity takeovers. The asset managers who own everything. The government that's been hollowed out. The empire that's falling. We've talked about slavery evolving, not ending. About whips replaced by debt. About masters who don't need plantations because they own the systems we can't live without. We've talked about mothers watching children die while algorithms decide their worth. About families destroyed by debt they didn't choose. About a system that extracts until nothing's left. And now there's only one question left: Are we going to war for government control or PE control? Because those are the choices. Not Democrat or Republican. Not liberal or conservative. Not capitalism or socialism. Government that can be held accountable, or private equity that cannot. Institutions that can, in theory, serve everyone, or extraction machines that serve only the few. A future we build together, or a future they own completely. I'm Here to Listen I put this Executive Order forward not as a finished product, but as a starting point. A way to say: We can do better. We must do better. We will do better. But I don't have all the answers. I don't pretend to. What I have is a willingness to listen. To learn. To fight alongside anyone who believes that no child should die because an insurance company said no. So tell me: Are you ready to fight? Are you ready to build? Are you ready to stop waiting for permission and start taking care of each other? Are we going to war for government control or PE control? The answer to that question will determine everything. I'm here. I'm listening on Tiktok. Let's build something that actually works. Accountability isn't about revenge. It's about telling the truth, understanding how the system failed, and making sure we don't rebuild the same problems again. We teach it, we fix it, and we move forward—together. – Vincent Cordova

Community Comments

Share a public response to this post. Submissions are reviewed before they appear.

0 approved comments

Loading comments...