Photo by Marija Zaric on Unsplash
By Vincent Cordova | Opinion Piece
In a world defined by shifting alliances and crumbling trust in global institutions, one truth has remained remarkably stable: the United States' unwavering allegiance to the State of Israel. No matter the administration, no matter the crisis, bipartisan U.S. support flows uninterrupted — not just diplomatically, but financially, militarily, and ideologically.
This piece isn't about religion. It isn't anti-Israel or anti-Jewish. It's about power, patterns, and the possibility that Israel may have served — intentionally or not — as a blueprint for a global order built on surveillance, control, and geopolitical engineering. And now, the foundation is showing cracks.
On May 14, 1948, Israel declared independence. Within 11 minutes, the United States became the first country to officially recognize it — setting the stage for decades of strategic support.
As of 2023, the U.S. has provided Israel with over $260 billion in cumulative aid — much of it military. The 2023 aid package alone was $3.8 billion, not including emergency supplements or missile defense spending.
The U.S. has funded billions into Israel's Iron Dome, Arrow, and David's Sling missile systems. These aren't just defensive measures — they are joint military-industrial projects, allowing Israel to act as a sandbox for U.S. defense tech.
Since 1972, the U.S. has vetoed over 45 U.N. Security Council resolutions critical of Israel. This makes Israel the most protected nation in U.N. history — a status not even extended to NATO allies.
Despite global outcry, President Trump moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem — a move even prior presidents hesitated to enact. It was a bold signal: recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's undivided capital, regardless of international law or peace process impact.
Brokered by the U.S., these normalized ties between Israel and several Arab nations — shifting the region's power balance. While presented as peace, they consolidated regional trade, surveillance, and weapons agreements under U.S.-Israeli alignment.
Companies like NSO Group (creators of Pegasus spyware) have sold tools to governments that violate human rights — with little U.S. accountability. These companies were funded, protected, and in some cases linked to U.S. contractors or intelligence ties.
This isn't just about alliance. It's ideological convergence:
This allegiance hasn't come without cost:
Is it possible that the U.S.–Israel relationship wasn't just special, but strategic in laying the groundwork for a broader global governance model that merges military technology, corporate power, and centralized authority?
And if that model is now failing — with Israel losing moral high ground and America being pulled into endless wars — should we not rethink what we've helped build?
As Americans, our loyalty must be to the Constitution, truth, and human dignity — not any foreign government. When our tax dollars are used to fund surveillance states abroad, and when global control mechanisms are being mirrored at home, we must ask:
Are we aiding an ally — or fueling an experiment in authoritarianism?
The world deserves peace. But peace cannot come from silence or blind allegiance. If Israel was once the prototype, then perhaps it's time to break the mold — and build something new, with justice at its core.
Could Israel have been positioned—through global alliances and power structures—as the intended headquarters of a One World Order?